Dr. Fauci Lied, People Died

An infamous email is finally unredacted.

I had to double check the source and the context of this email before I believed it. The language is so forthright and so contrasting to previous testimony given by Dr. Fauci it almost seems a fake. But there it is in black-and-white.

Yesterday, the Confressional Select Committee on Covid, released an unredacted email, which has been haunting many of us for over 2 years.

The original email, which came as a result of a FOIA request, starts simply:

Folks:

The call with Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome Trust) {REDACTED}

The unredacted version email is an astounding indictment of how disingenuous Dr Fauci has been and a keen example on how his team at the NIH and NIAID have abused the redaction process:

Folks:

The call with Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome Trust) went very well. Francis Collins joined and there were several highly credible scientists (including and in addition to the two that I spoke with last night) on the call with expertise in evolutionary biology. One point to make clear, and this was brought up on the Task Force call. Most of the rumors that are going around relate to the paper by an Indian group saying that there are HIV gene sequences ingeftedin the 2019-nCov virus. All of the scientists on our call felt that this was not credible, and tgey dismissed it as they the two did last night. That is not what they were concerned about.

They were concerned about the fact that upon viewing the sequences of severaisolates of the nCoV, there were mutations in the virus that would be most unusuat to have evolved naturally in the bats and that there was a suspicion that this mutation was intentionally inserted. The suspicion was heightened by the fact that scientists in Wuhan University are known to have been working on gain-of-function experiments to determine the molecular mechanisms associated with bat viruses adapting to human infection, and the outbreak originated in Wuhan. Upon considerable discussion, some of the scientists felt morestrongly about this possibility, but two others felt differently. They felt that it was entirely conceivable that this could have evolved naturally even though these mutations have nèver been seen in a bat virus before. The reasons for each side of the argument are too complicated to bother you with. Bottom line is that they all agreed with my strong suggestion to gather an even larger group under the auspices of an internationally credible organization. After some discussion they all felt that the WHO would be the most appropriate convener of such agroup, and that the scientific experts be broadly representative of the global scientific confirunity. Jeremy Farrar and Francis Collins will contact Tedros and ask him to do this. They hope to initiate this in the next day or so.

They pass no judgment at all at this point and feel that the group's mandate should be: "What are the evolutionady origins of 2019-CoV, important for future risk assessment and understanding of animal/human coronaviruses". In this way, there is no assumption of foul play or guilt on anyone's part and merely an intense scientific look at the evolutionary origins of this virus. Where that/eads remains to be seen. Happy to chat with any of you about this.

Best regards,

Tony

We’ll have more decided reaction to this crazy email which uncovers everything that Dr. Fauci has been denying.

The suspicion was heightened by the fact that scientists in Wuhan University are known to have been working on gain-of-function experiments to determine the molecular mechanisms associated with bat viruses adapting to human infection, and the outbreak originated in Wuhan.

Thoughts?