OK, let’s have some more fun. Here are the various outcomes.

Let's represent the various electoral scenarios with their associated probabilities and then compare each to a poker hand in Texas Hold'em with a similar percentage chance of winning.

This will help illustrate the strategic positions of both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris in the election, extending our poker analogy in way you can learn pretty quickly.

**Electoral Scenario 1: Trump Wins Pennsylvania**

**Trump's Chance of Winning the Election:****93.8%****Explanation:**Winning Pennsylvania significantly boosts Trump's path to 270 electoral votes. It acts as a tipping point state, greatly increasing his overall chances.

**Poker Hand Analogy**

**Hand After Flop:****Trump holds A♠ A♥, and the flop is A♦ K♣ 5♠ (Trump has a set of Aces)****Opponent's Hand:****K♦ Q♦ (pair of Kings)****Trump's Chance of Winning:****Approximately 95%**

This scenario reflects Trump's dominant position after winning Pennsylvania, where Kamala Harris would need a highly unlikely set of events (like the opponent hitting running Queens for a full house) to overcome his lead.

But wait… there’s more!

## Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Rational Ground by Justin Hart to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.