The infamous censorship court case, beyond my own case, is the Missouri vs. Biden lawsuit, which went to oral arguments before a judge yesterday. I provide you this one excerpt and it is amazing. Take a listen.
CAPTIONS ON THE VIDEO
TRANSCRIPT:
Thank you, Your Honor, and may please the court.
John Sauer of Louisiana, on behalf of all the
plaintiffs, appellees, and then my colleague from Missouri, Mr.
Devine.
I think we'll address the court for five minutes.
After I do, I want to start by
asking the court to imagine a scenario where
senior White House staffers contact the book publishers.
You know, Amazon, Borders, Barnes and Noble in the
United States and they tell them we want to
have a book burning program and we want to
help you implement this book burning program.
We want to identify for you
the books that we want burned.
And by the way, the books that
we want burned are the books that
criticize the administration and its policies.
And suppose they said, we want to
be partners in this book burning effort.
And when they didn't get the cooperation
they wanted, for example, one time they
said, hey, here's twelve authors.
We want you to pull off the shelves and burn.
These are the really bad ones.
You got to burn those books.
And the booksellers probably said, we
don't really want to do that.
Then two days later, the White House press
secretary was at the podium and said, these
booksellers need to burn more books.
And the president supports a robust antitrust program
to go after them, so they need to
do more to go after these books.
And later they started sending emails
that contained implied threatening communications like,
oh, you haven't burned enough books.
You haven't let us help you identify
the books we want you to burn.
And therefore internally we're considering our options
about what to do about it.
And when they lose their temper, they
use the F bomb against the booksellers.
And then all of a sudden, in the middle
of July of 2021, there is a one, two,
three public punch where the White House press secretary
and the surgeon general stayed at the podium.
And they say, these books are poison and
we are going to hold you accountable.
A word that the district court expressly found
carries with it the threat of consequences for
letting these books be on your shelves.
And then a few days later, the White
House communications secretary also goes public, and she
says, we're exploring legal liability against you because
you haven't burned enough books.
And we're looking at repealing a piece of legislation
that gives you a huge subsidy worth billions of
dollars if you don't burn more books.
And then suppose all the booksellers decided the game
wasn't worth a candle and they started complying.
And that's exactly what you see here in
the record here in July of 2021.
You see the platforms having resisted the White
House pressure for a significant period of time.
They complied on a number of issues,
but they're holding out on certain issues.
And all of a sudden after there's those
public threats combined with the private pressure campaign
that had lasted for months and months.
You see the platforms just given in, and
you see them essentially from then on, agreeing
with whatever the White House and the surgeon
general demanded on those particular issues.
And in particular, the White House had said,
deplatform these specific speakers, Alex Baronson, because we
think he's the epicenter of disinfo that radiates
out to the persuadable public.
In other words, the most persuasive speakers,
the ones who are most effective at
rebutting the government's preferred message.
The White House is privately
saying, take those people down.
Tucker Carlson, why aren't you d boosting a
video by Tucker Carlson, a Fox News critic
or Fox News host who's one of the
most prominent critics of the administration.
And what you see is the platforms complying.
They're under what the district court aptly described
as unrelenting pressure from the most powerful office
in the world, and apparently they complied.
So you see, in July of two.
This is great stuff and of course I'm glad it's happening. But I'd sure like to know exactly what price the criminals are likely to pay in the event freedom and justice wins? Any jail time or hefty fines for the people who did this? At some point, real accountability, in other words, severe consequences, have to happen to deter like-minded criminals. And also to restore a modicum of faith in our system.
Amazing. Amazingly Orwellian & dystopian. Thank you for sharing