Very interesting stuff. How legitimate is this organization that did the paper on miscarriages? I see in their conclusion they stated, "Considering the evidence presented here, we suggest the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X)[41] and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population".
Looking at athletes alone -- the only way (maybe) we can prove that the vaccines are dangerous and causing serious injuries is to compare before and now. Meaning, looking at a small subset -- athletes -- we can possibly find the data for the average number of professional athletes who died or were out for a season because of a serious medical issue over the last ten years -- then the number THIS year alone. Reading the stories (and there are many) of young, healthy (mostly) men dying or having heart attacks/serious medical issues on the field or right after a game it seems like a huge number ... but with nothing to compare this year to it falls on deaf ears. Does anyone have that data?
I believe the Re-Analyzed and Correctly Evaluated date comes from James Lyon-Weiler's IPAK. They used 3rd trimester numbers to compare and did not stae that these spontaneous aborions were Actually occuring in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. They fudged the data and basically lied to pull it off.
Very interesting stuff. How legitimate is this organization that did the paper on miscarriages? I see in their conclusion they stated, "Considering the evidence presented here, we suggest the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X)[41] and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population".
Looking at athletes alone -- the only way (maybe) we can prove that the vaccines are dangerous and causing serious injuries is to compare before and now. Meaning, looking at a small subset -- athletes -- we can possibly find the data for the average number of professional athletes who died or were out for a season because of a serious medical issue over the last ten years -- then the number THIS year alone. Reading the stories (and there are many) of young, healthy (mostly) men dying or having heart attacks/serious medical issues on the field or right after a game it seems like a huge number ... but with nothing to compare this year to it falls on deaf ears. Does anyone have that data?
Where did that UK comment come from? What was the source?
I believe the Re-Analyzed and Correctly Evaluated date comes from James Lyon-Weiler's IPAK. They used 3rd trimester numbers to compare and did not stae that these spontaneous aborions were Actually occuring in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. They fudged the data and basically lied to pull it off.
Man, You Are Good Justin! God Bless You and Yours and please keep up the fantastic research
data ! : ) Thanks again, so much. Dawn
Wow.