"especially when we know that their protection against infection is only fleeting?" HOW DO WE "KNOW" THAT? WHAT SCIENCE LEADS US TO SAY THAT? IF OUR POLICIES PIVOT ON THAT EVEN A LITTLE WHY SAY IT WITHOUT STRONG SCIENTIFIC BASIS?
ALSO SHOULDN'T WE ADDRESS THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS ADMITTED WHO ARE LESS THAN 14 DAYS BUT SUFFERING ADVERSE EVENTS? I SAT OUTSIDE OUR HOSPITAL ER RECEIVING FOR 2 HOURS AND ALL I SAW ADMITTED FOR 2 HOURS WAS UNDER 30 YEARS VACCINE INJURED...IN MANY CASES THEY WERE WALKING OVER DIRECTLY FROM CVS.
I think the truth is that the vaccines hurt anyone that covid would have hurt (assuming no early therapeutic treatments given). The elderly have been more susceptible to catching covid probably because of antibody dependent enhancement after a lifetime of exposure to other coronaviruses. Yes, this is a thing I was dismayed to learn. That would also explain why kids are relatively unscathed. But a lot of things about the vaccines would not be good for older people. The polyethylene glycol adjuvant for instance tends to cause cardiovascular collapse most frequently in people over 75.
Right now among my friends and family, vaxxed of all ages are catching covid. The phase 2 data for all three types of vaccine indicated they would fail after about 4 months (1 month for the Janssen shot). It looks here as if the vaccines contribute to bad outcomes on reinfection. And this is generally the opposite of what is trumpeted by the media and CDC and local boards of health
So what does it mean to "catch Covid?" The PCR test because it is an amplification test can detect ONE VIRAL PARTICLE - is that person actually infected? Respiratory viruses are endemic IN THE AIR WE BREATHE and so on any given day almost anyone who is breathing air amongst others could test positive for Covid and NEVER BE SICK AT ALL. That is because it takes approximately 1,000 viral particles all at once in order for the virus to effectively replicate and cause infection symptoms. "Asymptomatic Infection" is an oxymoron. "Pre-symtomatic," yes, asymptomatic, NO!
I caught covid and had a rough couple of days, had rapid PCR test say positive after a day fever etc. I'd call that covid. But the asymptomatic stuff seems like fiction
The PCR test absolutely detects Covid particles, BUT by the words of the inventor of the PCR test, it was NEVER intended to be a DIAGNOSTIC be-all-end-all replacing the Physician evaluation of SYMPTOMS. The PCR test does NOT evaluate viral load which is a critical piece of information in addition to symptoms. The appearance of symptoms indicates significant viral load and replication. The PCR test has and is being used as the sole determination of Covid "Cases," which is a term which is synonymous with "Infection." An "Asymptomatic Case" is therefore a contradiction of terms because if a personal has insufficient viral load to develop ANY symptoms, then how would that person have sufficient viral load to infect another person? Furthermore and even worse, the powers that be are using these "Cases," many of which come from routine testing of people with no symptoms, to justify severe measures in public schools, businesses and states. Also, every admission to hospitals is tested with the PCR test, regardless of the actual reason they are being admitted, and if they die in the hospital, the death is classified as caused by Covid, which artificially inflates the "Covid Hospitalizations" and "Covid Deaths." The fraud is rampant and wide-spread.
bad outcomes: antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) and original antibody sin (OAS).
OAS may be presenting: the vaxx induces a hesitant response to a slightly different antibody cue...... your bosy needs novice b cells and vaxxes sometime overtake novice b cells....
el gato malo is looking at OAS.....
the jabs were a project from dod called ADEPT which called for safe temporary antibody loading.. we got temporary, safe is a problem since 2013 when they hired mocerna they did not pursue.
I’ve been tracking Vermont’s reported deaths since November 12. 30 of 39 (77%) are over age 60…age groups that are nearly 100% vaccinated, according to the state.
Yet the data from the VT. dept of health continues to show that it is a pandemic of the vaccinated which I don’t believe. But the data that VT Digger gets from them is showing this and it’s what all our lawmakers are using to tighten restrictions . Can you speak to this?
Vermont's high death numbers could be a result of WRONGLY reporting the cause of death as Covid when people ACTUALLY died of something else! This has been happening all over the country since the very beginning of Covid. Hospitals get more $$ when it is a Covid Death.
23% of the 5-11 year olds are double vaxxed. Incredible. This is child abuse.
Cold selfish parents or else incredibly timorous.
lemming doing as told.... virtue signalling w/children. my niece fb'ed pix of her 9 and 6 y/o's after their jab..... I pray for them.
"especially when we know that their protection against infection is only fleeting?" HOW DO WE "KNOW" THAT? WHAT SCIENCE LEADS US TO SAY THAT? IF OUR POLICIES PIVOT ON THAT EVEN A LITTLE WHY SAY IT WITHOUT STRONG SCIENTIFIC BASIS?
ALSO SHOULDN'T WE ADDRESS THE NUMBER OF PATIENTS ADMITTED WHO ARE LESS THAN 14 DAYS BUT SUFFERING ADVERSE EVENTS? I SAT OUTSIDE OUR HOSPITAL ER RECEIVING FOR 2 HOURS AND ALL I SAW ADMITTED FOR 2 HOURS WAS UNDER 30 YEARS VACCINE INJURED...IN MANY CASES THEY WERE WALKING OVER DIRECTLY FROM CVS.
I think the truth is that the vaccines hurt anyone that covid would have hurt (assuming no early therapeutic treatments given). The elderly have been more susceptible to catching covid probably because of antibody dependent enhancement after a lifetime of exposure to other coronaviruses. Yes, this is a thing I was dismayed to learn. That would also explain why kids are relatively unscathed. But a lot of things about the vaccines would not be good for older people. The polyethylene glycol adjuvant for instance tends to cause cardiovascular collapse most frequently in people over 75.
Right now among my friends and family, vaxxed of all ages are catching covid. The phase 2 data for all three types of vaccine indicated they would fail after about 4 months (1 month for the Janssen shot). It looks here as if the vaccines contribute to bad outcomes on reinfection. And this is generally the opposite of what is trumpeted by the media and CDC and local boards of health
So what does it mean to "catch Covid?" The PCR test because it is an amplification test can detect ONE VIRAL PARTICLE - is that person actually infected? Respiratory viruses are endemic IN THE AIR WE BREATHE and so on any given day almost anyone who is breathing air amongst others could test positive for Covid and NEVER BE SICK AT ALL. That is because it takes approximately 1,000 viral particles all at once in order for the virus to effectively replicate and cause infection symptoms. "Asymptomatic Infection" is an oxymoron. "Pre-symtomatic," yes, asymptomatic, NO!
I caught covid and had a rough couple of days, had rapid PCR test say positive after a day fever etc. I'd call that covid. But the asymptomatic stuff seems like fiction
The PCR test absolutely detects Covid particles, BUT by the words of the inventor of the PCR test, it was NEVER intended to be a DIAGNOSTIC be-all-end-all replacing the Physician evaluation of SYMPTOMS. The PCR test does NOT evaluate viral load which is a critical piece of information in addition to symptoms. The appearance of symptoms indicates significant viral load and replication. The PCR test has and is being used as the sole determination of Covid "Cases," which is a term which is synonymous with "Infection." An "Asymptomatic Case" is therefore a contradiction of terms because if a personal has insufficient viral load to develop ANY symptoms, then how would that person have sufficient viral load to infect another person? Furthermore and even worse, the powers that be are using these "Cases," many of which come from routine testing of people with no symptoms, to justify severe measures in public schools, businesses and states. Also, every admission to hospitals is tested with the PCR test, regardless of the actual reason they are being admitted, and if they die in the hospital, the death is classified as caused by Covid, which artificially inflates the "Covid Hospitalizations" and "Covid Deaths." The fraud is rampant and wide-spread.
bad outcomes: antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) and original antibody sin (OAS).
OAS may be presenting: the vaxx induces a hesitant response to a slightly different antibody cue...... your bosy needs novice b cells and vaxxes sometime overtake novice b cells....
el gato malo is looking at OAS.....
the jabs were a project from dod called ADEPT which called for safe temporary antibody loading.. we got temporary, safe is a problem since 2013 when they hired mocerna they did not pursue.
I’ve been tracking Vermont’s reported deaths since November 12. 30 of 39 (77%) are over age 60…age groups that are nearly 100% vaccinated, according to the state.
Yet the data from the VT. dept of health continues to show that it is a pandemic of the vaccinated which I don’t believe. But the data that VT Digger gets from them is showing this and it’s what all our lawmakers are using to tighten restrictions . Can you speak to this?
Vermont's high death numbers could be a result of WRONGLY reporting the cause of death as Covid when people ACTUALLY died of something else! This has been happening all over the country since the very beginning of Covid. Hospitals get more $$ when it is a Covid Death.
Is it possible this is an artifact of the policy that requires many more tests for unvaccinated?
KFF found that vaxed seniors were a much higher % of hospitalized following a breakthrough than other ages. Might help explain this.