Probably. Even the tough "skeptical" questioners know which questions NOT to ask. For example, don't expect any Congressman to ask any questions suggesting that this virus was already spreading in America in the fall of 2019. Nor any questions that might prove some public health officials probably already knew this. And worked tirelessly to conceal this evidence from the public.
This said, it's okay - per the (conservative or Republican) narrative - to now question the "naturally-occurring" story line. This is progress. But WHEN are WHERE else the virus was spreading is still taboo info.
Anyone who is interested in this taboo topic can visit my Substack. I welcome debate and don't censor the speech of people who don't agree with my hypothesis.
oh good grief! he's saying it wasn't from a lab because it wasn't like they deliberately set out to make that particular virus? ok, so they were playing around, trying to make something more than what it was and maybe it got out by mistake, maybe it got out before they were really done with it. the fact is- if you end GOF research, kristian anderson loses his grants and is just a boring old virologist. at this point, GOF is the main purpose of virology and all those guys hate richard ebright who seems to be the only person with any sense
Questions and grilling and all for show.
Probably. Even the tough "skeptical" questioners know which questions NOT to ask. For example, don't expect any Congressman to ask any questions suggesting that this virus was already spreading in America in the fall of 2019. Nor any questions that might prove some public health officials probably already knew this. And worked tirelessly to conceal this evidence from the public.
This said, it's okay - per the (conservative or Republican) narrative - to now question the "naturally-occurring" story line. This is progress. But WHEN are WHERE else the virus was spreading is still taboo info.
Anyone who is interested in this taboo topic can visit my Substack. I welcome debate and don't censor the speech of people who don't agree with my hypothesis.
More word(mRNA)salad kabuki theater. What do they say in Hollyweird, something like "people that can't act become politicians" right?.
oh good grief! he's saying it wasn't from a lab because it wasn't like they deliberately set out to make that particular virus? ok, so they were playing around, trying to make something more than what it was and maybe it got out by mistake, maybe it got out before they were really done with it. the fact is- if you end GOF research, kristian anderson loses his grants and is just a boring old virologist. at this point, GOF is the main purpose of virology and all those guys hate richard ebright who seems to be the only person with any sense
How many people in Congress have an h-index higher than 56?