Makary is still off base. His statement "Vax deaths could approximate Covid deaths in boys 5-11 w/no comorb" [sic] ignores the very real and proven dangers of the vaccine, and >18,000 deaths on VAERS, to each age group vaccinated so far. Healthy children have no concerning risk from COVID, as Makary acknowledges. But giving them heart disease from this known microclot-inducing injection is a very real danger.
I cannot align the two components of this statement logically:
"Based on the data of kids w/ NO comorbid, an estimated 0-10 kids 5-11 have ever died of Covid VS. Approx 15 would die from the vax 2nd dose (extrap from adolescents). The case to vax kids w/a comorbid is strong. The case for a 2nd vax dose in healthy kids is far from compelling"
If 1-10 kids 5-11 have ever died, what is the case for a FIRST dose in healthy kids?
Ignoring the injuries that would / could shorten the kids lives (eg: increased cancer risk, myo/pericarditis), etc and focusing on mortality exclusively underestimates the negative consequences of vaccination in this age cohort and all ages IMO.
Makary is still off base. His statement "Vax deaths could approximate Covid deaths in boys 5-11 w/no comorb" [sic] ignores the very real and proven dangers of the vaccine, and >18,000 deaths on VAERS, to each age group vaccinated so far. Healthy children have no concerning risk from COVID, as Makary acknowledges. But giving them heart disease from this known microclot-inducing injection is a very real danger.
It's no longer debatable that we are in a battle of of ideas, we're in a war of good against unimaginable evil.
I cannot align the two components of this statement logically:
"Based on the data of kids w/ NO comorbid, an estimated 0-10 kids 5-11 have ever died of Covid VS. Approx 15 would die from the vax 2nd dose (extrap from adolescents). The case to vax kids w/a comorbid is strong. The case for a 2nd vax dose in healthy kids is far from compelling"
If 1-10 kids 5-11 have ever died, what is the case for a FIRST dose in healthy kids?
This analysis is not only better, it is correct: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/we-will-kill-117-kids-to-save-one
Ignoring the injuries that would / could shorten the kids lives (eg: increased cancer risk, myo/pericarditis), etc and focusing on mortality exclusively underestimates the negative consequences of vaccination in this age cohort and all ages IMO.