New Documents: Western Leader KNEW About the Lab Leak!
A recent tweet by our friend Restaf Levi has sent shockwaves around the Covid community and beyond. It revealed a set of confidential documents that allegedly were shown to the UK and other world leaders, confirming the COVID-19 lab leak. The doucuments were presented in March 2020, just weeks after the heinous “Proximal Origin” cover-up story.
The documents, which have been circulating online, confirm the main theory - that the virus was engineered at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) as part of a "gain of function" research project, and that Western governments knew about it but chose to launch smear attacks on those who spoke out about it.
The documents appear to be a briefing note prepared for the UK Prime Minister and his advisors, contain explosive information that challenges the official narrative of the COVID-19 pandemic. According to the briefing, the virus was engineered to be highly infectious and was released from the WIV laboratory in late 2019.
The briefing note, which is dated March 27, 2020, was prepared by a team of experts, including Professor Gwythian Prins, Sir Richard Dearlove, and Dr. John Constable, among others. The team analyzed the genetic sequence of the virus and found that it contained inserted sequences from both HIV and a flu strain, which is consistent with the idea that the virus was engineered in a laboratory.
The briefing note also reveals that the WIV had been conducting "gain of function" experiments on bat viruses, which involved manipulating the viruses to make them more infectious and deadly. The experiments were conducted in collaboration with international partners, including the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
The documents also suggest that the Chinese government was aware of the lab leak and was engaged in a cover-up effort to conceal the true nature and origin of the virus. The briefing note states that the Chinese government was desperate to "conceal the true nature and origin of the virus" and was using a "subtle, ruthless and clever strategy of misdirection" to achieve this goal.
The documents go on to reveal that the Chinese government was involved in a propaganda effort to promote the Wuhan Market theory, which suggests that the virus was transmitted to humans through an animal market in Wuhan. The briefing note states that this theory was "axiomatic" and that the Chinese government was using it to deflect blame and avoid responsibility for the lab leak.
The implications of these documents are staggering. If true, they suggest that major leaders were told early on about the lab-orgin of the virus suggesting a role of Western governments in the cover-up, and whether they were aware of the lab leak but chose to ignore it.
The documents have sparked a heated debate about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, with some experts arguing that they provide conclusive evidence of a lab leak, while others argue that they are inconclusive or misleading. However, the documents have also sparked a renewed call for transparency and accountability, with many experts demanding that the truth about the pandemic be revealed.
Note: The documents released by Restaf Levi are not officially verified, and their authenticity has not been confirmed. However, the information contained in the documents has been widely shared and discussed online, and has sparked a heated debate about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Over the weekend, a friend had asked me what I thought about this document. Here was my response (with a couple links added):
1) Who is supposed to have emblazoned this document with "Secret - Recipient's Eyes Only"? Nothing about that language is anything government would say. It sounds like a middle-school student and includes an error (should be Recipients').
2) I’m not familiar with the style or tone of this group of authors, but it doesn’t sound professional at all
3) It makes no sense that anyone would have been saying ANYTHING with this degree of certitude and urgency at the end of March 2020: "IT IS NOW BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT THAT COVID-19 WAS ENGINEERED IN WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY (WIV). SUCCESS IN VACCINE DESIGN IS UNLIKELY IF THIS IS NOT UNDERSTOOD...." etc.
4) The whole document feels anachronistic, but this is an especially "out of time" statement for a document (ostensibly) from 27 March 2020 and is the only time ‘pandemic’ is used in the document: "Bat virus RaTG13 has an unusual history. It was originally collected on 24 July 2013 but only registered six and a half years later, on 27 January 2020 (ie well after the COVID-19 pandemic was raging and a bare week before publication in Nature). It is also unique – unlike all other bat viruses. These, including the three added for comparison in Sørensen et al, show similarities to SARS but not to COVID-19. As mentioned, more will be added to this test before submission.” (p. 5)
A pandemic had not been declared on 27 Jan 2020 and there were no signs of anything “raging.”
5) Why do the authors refer to the virus as COVID-19? UK press and officials weren't using that term widely at the time. (Same is true in the U.S.) The prevailing term was “coronavirus.” The only use of SARS-CoV-2 is footnote 5, and only there because it’s in the title of an article.
6) Because Nature publications are emphasized, I find it strange that there’s no mention of the Gorbalenya et al naming/classification paper. [Short article about that here for anyone interested: https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/sars-cov-2-whats-in-a-name-everything] The Anderson paper was published 10 days prior to this memo, so it isn’t as though these authors wouldn’t have been aware of it.
7) Even if the memo is authentic - which would include being authentic to the time period, i.e., it was actually written in late March 2020 - because the emphasis is “This could be a dangerous thing from a lab!” the purpose of “releasing” it now as a “secret document” still serves the government narrative and corresponding actions, i.e., the government was being told it was from a lab and super scary so of course they locked us down. If authentic, I see it as simply another piece of circumstantial evidence pointing to a dual-sided op into which “primed,” willing, but largely unsuspecting academics & professionals were enlisted.
8) It is also an example of “scientists” reacting to a sequence upload. No casual link between that sequence and a new cause of death was ever established. We already know the causality aspect wasn’t within the purview of the ICTV-CSG (committee which re-named 2019-nCoV "SARS-CoV-2"). [See committee discussion here, if interested: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-sars-cov-2-name-game-long-read]
9) I’m less interested in what "it" (SARS-CoV-2) is or isn’t than I am in how it was decided a) something was spreading from person to person, and b) a new cause of death came on the scene. The authors of this memo - whenever it was written or whomever actually wrote it - were caught up in the wrong questions.
The lack of provenance of these documents is already causing controversy. They are not useful until there is further data. ~ Ginger Breggin