Wtf?? "We'll find out about this vaccine over time..." Eh? If that's not an admission of a live, ongoing experiment, I don't know what is. This makes me incensed.
I may be over-stating it, but I believe that I understood your "Wtf", etc. immediately. I was rather upset by replies that implied you were unaware previously....replied to one, feeling mildly "incensed" 😉, nah, but miffed.
He sounds like someone who took the vaccines and boosters then had a “awaking” to what it can do. Personally, I think he is in fear for his own life and now, wants to know everything so he can take care of himself. Karma always gets her man!!
What makes you think I missed that? You answered your own question: 'safe and effective', 'confirmed' by the trial data and the PR spin, as told by public health, governments, media... basically all the authorities people listen to. If your average vaccine recipient questioned any of the obvious points you listed, they were referred back to the mantra. It was never termed 'experimental', though I'm sure a lot of people still thought of it as such. Mass vaccination in the midst of a pandemic was also experimental, it's not just the
mRNA and the delivery system. The weight of the 'crisis' shifted the psychology in favour of mass compliance.
And now scientists like this have the audacity to sit and ponder how it will all turn out 🤯
Own my part in what? What gave you the impression, from anything I've written, that I listened to or complied with those authorities? I've supported the GB scientists and experts, and other 'dissidents', since day one. I have a forensic knowledge of what's been going on. I refused the vaccine and remain unvaccinated - and suffered everything that came with that choice.
I think a couple readers of Sally's initial comment ascribed a mindset to her that came from their own minds, never reflected hers.
I grasped from that first comment that Sally understood the plot. Those scolding replies to her are a puzzle.
Is it hard to comprehend being "incensed" by this man's attempt at a "limited hangout"? Hearing him try to cover his own back-end? He surely has known from the start, the jabs are death-dealing, and that harms they cause are anything but "rare".
The original comment was obviously an objection to the man's disingenuous spiel.
It wasn't a statement made by a newly aware, formerly duped individual. It didn't read like that.
Maybe some people seek to see naivete, or stupidity, or negligence in information gathering in others...so they can wax superior?
And he minimizes effects of myocarditis suggesting it’s a nothing burger. It’s freaking life long damage to the heart muscle which does not repair itself . Offit is a complete POS
I knew he had changed his mind a bit on the vaccines however, to hear him so casually decry that “all vaccines have a risk. If there’s an upside, there is a downside” just shocked me. Many of us knew that and so many physicians said that and yet they were called conspiracy, theorist, and purveyors of misinformation, and nobody stopped it. I am flabbergasted by this admission and just the casualness of it.
I am not surprised. Not one of them will take responsibility for the influence they used to push this toxic crap. They are not going to ask forgiveness ... they are casually blaming those that took it. Transferring the responsibility back to the people who trusted them. It is what bullies do.
Jesus on a motorbike! He's almost literally making the same argument as many of us, you included Justin, were making 3 f*#king years ago. The facts CANNOT be clearer. He even suggests that the CDC make available the data that many of us have had to dig for, unrelentingly, over the same timeframe. Rest assured, however, that the CDC will do nothing close to what he suggests. The CDC's job, announced or unannounced, is to INCREASE vaccine uptake, period. #WeAreSoScrewed
I ask you not to ask others to live their lives by your standards/beliefs, rather than their own. Editing their speech, even for the sake of your feelings, is dishonest. Please, prefer honest expression.
You might be surprised to recognize that many who would use such an expression involving Jesus have the greatest respect for his life and demonstration of holding to his integrity, no matter the consequences. And, respect for his advice, "Seek ye the truth."
Surprised, ad you are a bit behind on the curve. I looked up "blaspheme". The first definition referred to an "irreverent" use of a term considered sacred ('God', or a name of a prophet, eg.).
The next definitions did not apply, obviously. Those involved 'excoriation' and demonstration/expressions of contempt.
In my own spiritual experience, God values "irreverence", as honesty and humor, as a proper sense of perspective.
I very much suspect that Jesus would laugh. At least, the reference shows that he comes to mind.
Finally, your being offended, is neither here nor there. I am sure I would offend monarchists by referring to the British royal family as "Britain's most expensive welfare case," as did my English husband. But, hey...they must deal with it. They have their 'lords' too.
Your position reveals a conception of Jesus as a demanding tyrant or even a wimp, a drag, a hyper-sensitive, thin-skinned wuss/tyrant (often the same), who insists on constantly being shown deference.
I think, he prefers easy friendship. No walking on eggs around him.
Your willingness to ascribe a lack of respect to that commenter 's expression may be derived from your own lack of awareness. In context, such a 'take' on it made no sense.
Bluntly, then. You may express your opinion of another's chosen expressions legitimately. You may rightly say you don't appreciate it, call it crude or offensive, whatever. But even 'asking' another to confirm to your speech guidelines is quite a road beyond expressing your opinion. It is misguided, quite arrogant really.
He seems to concur with Bret Weinstein's concerns of the cell damage caused by an immune response away from the injection site causing myocarditis. Don't we also know that a very frequent place for the vaccine to travel is to the ovaries? Anyone concerned about what cell damage there might result in? Jeez.
mNRA doesn’t work like vaccines. It changes the DNA, it travels in the body, it doesn’t go away. We need to stop calling it a vaccine and call it what it is
A “nMRA kill shot”. It is doctors trying to play G*d and changed a person genetic DNA.
So he sweepingly helped recommend them to everyone else, but doesn’t want it himself. I guess at least he came out and said it. This is one of those examples we try to teach kids and maybe forget as adults sometimes. Watch what they do, not what they say.
Or did Paul Offit really have Flu, not Covid? Oh! I see - he 'tested' for Covid? Is that a pig up there?
Highly likely, as the Flu miraculously disappeared from the face of the earth in early 2020. They're embarrassingly obvious about what really went on since the planned release of Covid and subsequent Big Pharma MARKETING CAMPAIGN for DEADLY jabs they call "Vaccines"! See the ridiculously unbelievable WHO Charts!
And all the while, Big Pharma claim TOTAL IMPUNITY from all Vax-related DEATHS and Injuries! What a fantastic Business Plan. NO LIABILITY is the biggest clue these jabs are potentially LETHAL!
So 72 year old Paul Offit (reportedly in a high risk group) didn't take last year's bivalent shot and he's not taking this year's new shot. He thinks he doesn't need it and he's Paul Offit so he gets to make that choice. Yet college students (low risk group) all over the country were mandated to take last year's bivalent shot or else not attend college.
Harvard University's policy up until May 2023 (like many elite colleges) was that all students were mandated to be "up to date" on their covid shots to "protect the community" per CDC policy yet staff and faculty were merely recommended to do so. Why wasn't Paul Offit shouting from the rooftops about these mandates for college students? Was he still being too "surprised about myocarditis and pericarditis"?
Fortunately, I have known to completely discount his ridiculous, lousy opinions from many moons ago. Still, even a broken clock can be right twice a day.
Wtf?? "We'll find out about this vaccine over time..." Eh? If that's not an admission of a live, ongoing experiment, I don't know what is. This makes me incensed.
Hang ‘em High!!!
I may be over-stating it, but I believe that I understood your "Wtf", etc. immediately. I was rather upset by replies that implied you were unaware previously....replied to one, feeling mildly "incensed" 😉, nah, but miffed.
He sounds like someone who took the vaccines and boosters then had a “awaking” to what it can do. Personally, I think he is in fear for his own life and now, wants to know everything so he can take care of himself. Karma always gets her man!!
What makes you think I missed that? You answered your own question: 'safe and effective', 'confirmed' by the trial data and the PR spin, as told by public health, governments, media... basically all the authorities people listen to. If your average vaccine recipient questioned any of the obvious points you listed, they were referred back to the mantra. It was never termed 'experimental', though I'm sure a lot of people still thought of it as such. Mass vaccination in the midst of a pandemic was also experimental, it's not just the
mRNA and the delivery system. The weight of the 'crisis' shifted the psychology in favour of mass compliance.
And now scientists like this have the audacity to sit and ponder how it will all turn out 🤯
Own my part in what? What gave you the impression, from anything I've written, that I listened to or complied with those authorities? I've supported the GB scientists and experts, and other 'dissidents', since day one. I have a forensic knowledge of what's been going on. I refused the vaccine and remain unvaccinated - and suffered everything that came with that choice.
Get over yourself. 🙄
I think a couple readers of Sally's initial comment ascribed a mindset to her that came from their own minds, never reflected hers.
I grasped from that first comment that Sally understood the plot. Those scolding replies to her are a puzzle.
Is it hard to comprehend being "incensed" by this man's attempt at a "limited hangout"? Hearing him try to cover his own back-end? He surely has known from the start, the jabs are death-dealing, and that harms they cause are anything but "rare".
The original comment was obviously an objection to the man's disingenuous spiel.
It wasn't a statement made by a newly aware, formerly duped individual. It didn't read like that.
Maybe some people seek to see naivete, or stupidity, or negligence in information gathering in others...so they can wax superior?
There’s a downside for a 2 month old receiving 8 vaccines at one visit for infections they are not at risk for.
What a turd...not willing to take the poisons he told millions to take. Another big time medical coward.
Lol 😂
Actually he’s not taking this year’s. Can only hope he’s taken the previous 3-5 or so!
And he minimizes effects of myocarditis suggesting it’s a nothing burger. It’s freaking life long damage to the heart muscle which does not repair itself . Offit is a complete POS
I knew he had changed his mind a bit on the vaccines however, to hear him so casually decry that “all vaccines have a risk. If there’s an upside, there is a downside” just shocked me. Many of us knew that and so many physicians said that and yet they were called conspiracy, theorist, and purveyors of misinformation, and nobody stopped it. I am flabbergasted by this admission and just the casualness of it.
Same. If he's casual about it, he seems rational and informed. Meanwhile, we are--and should be--flabbergasted and pissed.
Yes, it is shocking when habitual self-serving liars suddenly let a little truth out. Maybe Offit could use that in the Nuremberg 2.0 trials.
I am not surprised. Not one of them will take responsibility for the influence they used to push this toxic crap. They are not going to ask forgiveness ... they are casually blaming those that took it. Transferring the responsibility back to the people who trusted them. It is what bullies do.
Jesus on a motorbike! He's almost literally making the same argument as many of us, you included Justin, were making 3 f*#king years ago. The facts CANNOT be clearer. He even suggests that the CDC make available the data that many of us have had to dig for, unrelentingly, over the same timeframe. Rest assured, however, that the CDC will do nothing close to what he suggests. The CDC's job, announced or unannounced, is to INCREASE vaccine uptake, period. #WeAreSoScrewed
I ask you not to blaspheme, using my Lord’s name, to make a point.
Tap dancing Jesus on a speedboat...
Christ on a crutch!
I prefer "Jesus tap dancing on a barstool," but I recognize the follow on. 😊
I'm the youngest of a large Irish Catholic family so instinctively felt like I had permission to say that. ;-)
I ask you not to ask others to live their lives by your standards/beliefs, rather than their own. Editing their speech, even for the sake of your feelings, is dishonest. Please, prefer honest expression.
You might be surprised to recognize that many who would use such an expression involving Jesus have the greatest respect for his life and demonstration of holding to his integrity, no matter the consequences. And, respect for his advice, "Seek ye the truth."
Surprised, ad you are a bit behind on the curve. I looked up "blaspheme". The first definition referred to an "irreverent" use of a term considered sacred ('God', or a name of a prophet, eg.).
The next definitions did not apply, obviously. Those involved 'excoriation' and demonstration/expressions of contempt.
In my own spiritual experience, God values "irreverence", as honesty and humor, as a proper sense of perspective.
I very much suspect that Jesus would laugh. At least, the reference shows that he comes to mind.
Finally, your being offended, is neither here nor there. I am sure I would offend monarchists by referring to the British royal family as "Britain's most expensive welfare case," as did my English husband. But, hey...they must deal with it. They have their 'lords' too.
Your position reveals a conception of Jesus as a demanding tyrant or even a wimp, a drag, a hyper-sensitive, thin-skinned wuss/tyrant (often the same), who insists on constantly being shown deference.
I think, he prefers easy friendship. No walking on eggs around him.
Your willingness to ascribe a lack of respect to that commenter 's expression may be derived from your own lack of awareness. In context, such a 'take' on it made no sense.
Bluntly, then. You may express your opinion of another's chosen expressions legitimately. You may rightly say you don't appreciate it, call it crude or offensive, whatever. But even 'asking' another to confirm to your speech guidelines is quite a road beyond expressing your opinion. It is misguided, quite arrogant really.
Offit is like a rat on a sinking ship.
Exactly.
He seems to concur with Bret Weinstein's concerns of the cell damage caused by an immune response away from the injection site causing myocarditis. Don't we also know that a very frequent place for the vaccine to travel is to the ovaries? Anyone concerned about what cell damage there might result in? Jeez.
mNRA doesn’t work like vaccines. It changes the DNA, it travels in the body, it doesn’t go away. We need to stop calling it a vaccine and call it what it is
A “nMRA kill shot”. It is doctors trying to play G*d and changed a person genetic DNA.
And Myocarditis is just one type of adverse event documented from these “vaccines”.
How many are there?
Hundreds, if not thousands…
So he sweepingly helped recommend them to everyone else, but doesn’t want it himself. I guess at least he came out and said it. This is one of those examples we try to teach kids and maybe forget as adults sometimes. Watch what they do, not what they say.
I don’t blame him. I’m a physician and I won’t be getting it either.
I blame him mightily!
Too bad you gave all the other vaccines to children. And you didn't know all vaccines are useless and dangerous and asinine and unscientific
"If the benefits aren't clear, then it's not so reasonable to take risks, even rare risks."
There ya go.
Or did Paul Offit really have Flu, not Covid? Oh! I see - he 'tested' for Covid? Is that a pig up there?
Highly likely, as the Flu miraculously disappeared from the face of the earth in early 2020. They're embarrassingly obvious about what really went on since the planned release of Covid and subsequent Big Pharma MARKETING CAMPAIGN for DEADLY jabs they call "Vaccines"! See the ridiculously unbelievable WHO Charts!
And all the while, Big Pharma claim TOTAL IMPUNITY from all Vax-related DEATHS and Injuries! What a fantastic Business Plan. NO LIABILITY is the biggest clue these jabs are potentially LETHAL!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
What a Prick!!!
So 72 year old Paul Offit (reportedly in a high risk group) didn't take last year's bivalent shot and he's not taking this year's new shot. He thinks he doesn't need it and he's Paul Offit so he gets to make that choice. Yet college students (low risk group) all over the country were mandated to take last year's bivalent shot or else not attend college.
Harvard University's policy up until May 2023 (like many elite colleges) was that all students were mandated to be "up to date" on their covid shots to "protect the community" per CDC policy yet staff and faculty were merely recommended to do so. Why wasn't Paul Offit shouting from the rooftops about these mandates for college students? Was he still being too "surprised about myocarditis and pericarditis"?
Fortunately, I have known to completely discount his ridiculous, lousy opinions from many moons ago. Still, even a broken clock can be right twice a day.