16 Comments
User's avatar
Joel Walbert's avatar

Wouldnt have taken it even if it was a traditional vaccine with a perfect track record of safety and effectiveness. I had one vaccine plus booster as a child (when I had no choice) and made it almost half a century without issue. Health does NOT come in a syringe. Or a pill.

Expand full comment
Blondie's avatar

Dr. Malone said in an interview that Moderna's patent application says "gene therapy" not "vaccine".

Expand full comment
RebeccaGrrrl's avatar

Can’t we get copies of this crap? Let’s put this out there with the actual document? Nothing against you Bett - just wishing out loud

Expand full comment
Helena's avatar

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285220000017/mrna-20200630.htm

Search 'gene therapy' in this official SEC filing submitted by ModeRNA: "Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. "

Expand full comment
Lioness of Judah Ministry's avatar

This truth is hidden in plain sight in their own documents nobody is talking about...

" mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing

The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight"

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-are-gene-therapy-may

Expand full comment
Todd Naples's avatar

HANG EVERYONE OF THEM MURDERING MOTHERFUCKERS IMMEDIATELY

Expand full comment
KaiKai's avatar

no sharing, retweeting or commenting on the Ginn tweet. Let the control games begin.

Expand full comment
curveball's avatar

You can retweet from the original post linked in the article, Eileen.

Expand full comment
stpaulchuck's avatar

fookin' told people this over a year ago. Got savaged for going against the "science" as promulgated by CNN and MSLSD and the NYT? How ya like me know beotches??

Expand full comment
Hoopester's avatar

So what? They are not going to do anything about it because They are all in on it.

Expand full comment
Gaye's avatar

Who did not know this?? Jonathan Couey has been saying it for two and a half years. These are transfections, not vaccines. This paper is over a year old and he and Piper are still right.

https://medium.com/gigaohm-biological/5-concerns-about-sars-cov2-biology-a-call-to-pause-deliberate-and-revise-policy-493d18bdd826

Expand full comment
waitingForTheStorm's avatar

I remember hearing that the vax was mRNA based from the beginning. I have enough science education and did enough research to believe that this may be a very bad idea and that I would wait it out to see if there were negative consequences of using this approach. I feel somewhat vindicated in my skepticism.

Expand full comment
this little authoritarian's avatar

I agree. My circumstances allowed me to initially defer getting one of these transfections. I then begin lots of reading on the subject. I thought Novavax might be worth it but was still concerned about the narrow spike-focus. Then i got covid and the whole thing became moot anyway. I can't say it was nice (fully symptomatic, not pleasant) or easy, maybe I had little cross-immunity/prior exposure. Anyway, I've since recovered and I still don't regret not getting one of these transfections (though I came close at the peak of my fever and breathlessness). I do tell people that covid is unpredictable even if you don't have comorbidities or you fall within a group that is at low risk. However, that doesn't mean you're gonna be better off with these "vaccines". Early treatment is clearly what is needed and the suppression of that is without a doubt, criminal.

Expand full comment
Gaye's avatar

And should be prosecutable.

Expand full comment
Guynoir's avatar

Bayer made Zyklon B too. Where are those poll numbers?

Expand full comment
Cece_State48's avatar

Pfizer and Moderna SEC filings both identify their products as "gene therapy." Everyone involved in this farce should be tarred and feathered.

Expand full comment