Wouldnt have taken it even if it was a traditional vaccine with a perfect track record of safety and effectiveness. I had one vaccine plus booster as a child (when I had no choice) and made it almost half a century without issue. Health does NOT come in a syringe. Or a pill.
This truth is hidden in plain sight in their own documents nobody is talking about...
" mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing
The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight"
fookin' told people this over a year ago. Got savaged for going against the "science" as promulgated by CNN and MSLSD and the NYT? How ya like me know beotches??
Who did not know this?? Jonathan Couey has been saying it for two and a half years. These are transfections, not vaccines. This paper is over a year old and he and Piper are still right.
I remember hearing that the vax was mRNA based from the beginning. I have enough science education and did enough research to believe that this may be a very bad idea and that I would wait it out to see if there were negative consequences of using this approach. I feel somewhat vindicated in my skepticism.
I agree. My circumstances allowed me to initially defer getting one of these transfections. I then begin lots of reading on the subject. I thought Novavax might be worth it but was still concerned about the narrow spike-focus. Then i got covid and the whole thing became moot anyway. I can't say it was nice (fully symptomatic, not pleasant) or easy, maybe I had little cross-immunity/prior exposure. Anyway, I've since recovered and I still don't regret not getting one of these transfections (though I came close at the peak of my fever and breathlessness). I do tell people that covid is unpredictable even if you don't have comorbidities or you fall within a group that is at low risk. However, that doesn't mean you're gonna be better off with these "vaccines". Early treatment is clearly what is needed and the suppression of that is without a doubt, criminal.
Wouldnt have taken it even if it was a traditional vaccine with a perfect track record of safety and effectiveness. I had one vaccine plus booster as a child (when I had no choice) and made it almost half a century without issue. Health does NOT come in a syringe. Or a pill.
Dr. Malone said in an interview that Moderna's patent application says "gene therapy" not "vaccine".
Can’t we get copies of this crap? Let’s put this out there with the actual document? Nothing against you Bett - just wishing out loud
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000168285220000017/mrna-20200630.htm
Search 'gene therapy' in this official SEC filing submitted by ModeRNA: "Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. "
This truth is hidden in plain sight in their own documents nobody is talking about...
" mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing
The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight"
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-are-gene-therapy-may
HANG EVERYONE OF THEM MURDERING MOTHERFUCKERS IMMEDIATELY
no sharing, retweeting or commenting on the Ginn tweet. Let the control games begin.
You can retweet from the original post linked in the article, Eileen.
fookin' told people this over a year ago. Got savaged for going against the "science" as promulgated by CNN and MSLSD and the NYT? How ya like me know beotches??
So what? They are not going to do anything about it because They are all in on it.
Who did not know this?? Jonathan Couey has been saying it for two and a half years. These are transfections, not vaccines. This paper is over a year old and he and Piper are still right.
https://medium.com/gigaohm-biological/5-concerns-about-sars-cov2-biology-a-call-to-pause-deliberate-and-revise-policy-493d18bdd826
I remember hearing that the vax was mRNA based from the beginning. I have enough science education and did enough research to believe that this may be a very bad idea and that I would wait it out to see if there were negative consequences of using this approach. I feel somewhat vindicated in my skepticism.
I agree. My circumstances allowed me to initially defer getting one of these transfections. I then begin lots of reading on the subject. I thought Novavax might be worth it but was still concerned about the narrow spike-focus. Then i got covid and the whole thing became moot anyway. I can't say it was nice (fully symptomatic, not pleasant) or easy, maybe I had little cross-immunity/prior exposure. Anyway, I've since recovered and I still don't regret not getting one of these transfections (though I came close at the peak of my fever and breathlessness). I do tell people that covid is unpredictable even if you don't have comorbidities or you fall within a group that is at low risk. However, that doesn't mean you're gonna be better off with these "vaccines". Early treatment is clearly what is needed and the suppression of that is without a doubt, criminal.
And should be prosecutable.
Bayer made Zyklon B too. Where are those poll numbers?
Pfizer and Moderna SEC filings both identify their products as "gene therapy." Everyone involved in this farce should be tarred and feathered.