Exactly, Timothy Winey. Masks NEVER worked. Yet, they caught on like a new dance, and in the aftermath, people are still doing the Masks Work Electric Slide.
Any virologist worth his salt already knows that the mask can't keep out most viruses. Viruses are notoriously small and using those masks is like using a deer fence to try to keep out fruitflies. The holes in masks are too large to keep viruses out. My husband is a virologist/immunologist of many decades and worked in Public Health Dept. of PA - those are the folks who know all about how to manage epidemics and advise the public on how to manage them. Their job is to know about diseases.
I just got an email from Royal Bank of Canada telling me they "continue to follow provincial public health guidelines and monitor the COVID-19 situation." Currently, that means they advise the wearing of masks but do not require them of customers or staff. I just have to ask: What the heck is the province using to justify the continuing advice to wear masks? And why would Canada's largest bank follow a stupid harmful guideline that makes no sense?
Captain obvious says. Of course masks don't work for viral transmission. How would you test for "transmission" anyhow, a PCR test or an Antibody test? Neither of them look for "virus's". "There is no evidence of transmission of HIV" - Anthony Fauci, 1988 https://www.bitchute.com/video/TEPbjQMTqddZ/
PCR is not a test for anything, one of the 2 creators of it even said that in a video I saw. It should never be used as a test, he said, because it gives false positives. It is to obtain more info on DNA strands but it isn't a test. Antibody tests don't look for viruses, you are correct - because those tests look for antibodies to the virus - and if present, they tell you that the person has had that particular virus. This means you can use antibody tests to see if transmission of that virus has occurred. I'm married to a virologist of many decades who has worked with all these things, including PCR process.
I"ve wondered the same thing, he died about 6 months before covid came out and hated Fauci, also told ALOT of truth that deep state doesn't want us to know. He was an amazing scientist. Agreed about your last sentence, too! You've really been paying attention and have done your research, kudos to you!
I got this info from my husband, a virologist/immunologist of about 50 yrs experience. He says "viruses produce antibodies". You are quoting FDA - who are notorious for lying to the public. My husband has been watching them for decades. In this case it has no idea what they're talking about. Antibodies produced by a vaccine protect you from the virus - if this doesn't happen it either wasn't a vax or or it wasn't an effective vax. In this case, the vax didn't protect anyone from covid - so maybe FDA is inadvertently stating the truth? I don't know what they are talking about but in any vaccine made correctly it protects a person from the virus where antibodies came from. So yes, there most certainly is such a thing as "antibodies from a virus".
Ok. Then tell me what antibodies you get from nano-organic mercury, nano aluminum, mRNA that has the same structure as snake venom, mRNA from a Moth, Luciferase, firefly DNA. and... (SNIP) Covid vaccines contain NIH: Sodium Chloride drive autoimmune disease. NIH: Tromethamine, a Melamine, and Azatrine drive sterilization. Toxic SM-102 ethanol w/ Chloroform. Polyethlene Glycol (PEG) causing anaphylaxis, a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat. Novavax Animal mRNA. Animal Venom, Viper Venom. Mercury & Aluminum. Organic Mercury in the form of Thiormersal like preservatives is in all injectibles. EPA: Mercury can cause brain and nervous system damage with in-utero exposure, and can cause kidney problems in both adults and children. NIH: Aluminum is the most neuro-toxic metal on Earth. And, as they claim there are 1.67 Million "virus's", which Antibodies do those produce?
Let me phrase it a different way: If a vax was done right and is truly a vax, your body will produce antibodies when the vax is introduced into your body. That's why people get an antibodies test - because if you have had the disease, your body will produce antibodies to that disease. A vaccine IF DONE RIGHT will do the same thing as if you've had the disease, meaning it will stimulate production of antibodies. That is why some people have gotten an antibodies test - to see if they have had covid or been exposed. If you have antibodies against a disease, your body has created some immunity against that disease, whether it's from your own body creating it or from a vaccine.
Um huh! Alex Jones said that "real vaccine's" are 99.9% effective for at least a decade!! Does that include the polio vaccine, where the Wikipedia sources admit that there is 400% more vaccine induced polio than what they call natural polio? Which was in fact, DDT poisoning. And, effective at what? All injectables have nano organic mercury in them! See the Wikipedia on preservatives in injectables. What does he mean by "effective"? Brain Damage?? https://www.bitchute.com/video/6qXdTECgTWbj/
Justin, there is a small problem with your new infographic: Abaluck (2022) did not conclude "no statistical difference". In fact, in the final publication the authors claim a statistically significant (just barely!) effect of 9.5% reduction in symptomatic seropositivity. You or I might read the study, and the Jefferson et al. criticisms, and decide: "no statistical difference, really". But that is NOT what the authors said, so you should not report it that way.
Scientific studies were done in the 1920's after the Spanish Flu Pandemic and the conclusion then were masks didn't work. 100 years later the pseudo-scientists like Fauci ignored that evidence, (but not at first), and claimed they worked. That was our first clue he was crooked.
What was poured over the study? Pancake syrup? Honestly. The phrase should be "pored over the study". It's hard to concentrate on the very good message when running across a major error in the first sentence.
The evidence has been in for over 100 years. https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/04/02/everyone-wore-masks-during-1918-flu-pandemic-they-were-useless/
Exactly, Timothy Winey. Masks NEVER worked. Yet, they caught on like a new dance, and in the aftermath, people are still doing the Masks Work Electric Slide.
Thank you!!!
Amazing what it takes to prove what we already knew to be true. But the MSM and the medical industrial complex will never acknowledge they were wrong.
Pittsburgh VA hospital only got rid of mask requirements just In May.
Pittsburgh VA hospital had been requiring masks or entry and medical care was denied to veterans.
How was that humane?
First, these clowns would have had to prove that masking makes any kind of difference. That has never been shown.
Says right on the box that the masks do not prevent covid.
I've come to believe the masks are used as punishment in the hospital for anyone who refuses a shot (flu/covid).
It is just like the "yellow star."
Any virologist worth his salt already knows that the mask can't keep out most viruses. Viruses are notoriously small and using those masks is like using a deer fence to try to keep out fruitflies. The holes in masks are too large to keep viruses out. My husband is a virologist/immunologist of many decades and worked in Public Health Dept. of PA - those are the folks who know all about how to manage epidemics and advise the public on how to manage them. Their job is to know about diseases.
I just got an email from Royal Bank of Canada telling me they "continue to follow provincial public health guidelines and monitor the COVID-19 situation." Currently, that means they advise the wearing of masks but do not require them of customers or staff. I just have to ask: What the heck is the province using to justify the continuing advice to wear masks? And why would Canada's largest bank follow a stupid harmful guideline that makes no sense?
VA still providing covid shots to veterans...because nothing is too good for our veterans. /s/
Have been saying it for years, that they don't protect you from grems!!
Of course they don't work.
There is no 'virus', and germ theory is a fraud. Duh!
Covid was a bioweapon.
Sure, bro. Keep believing that.
Captain obvious says. Of course masks don't work for viral transmission. How would you test for "transmission" anyhow, a PCR test or an Antibody test? Neither of them look for "virus's". "There is no evidence of transmission of HIV" - Anthony Fauci, 1988 https://www.bitchute.com/video/TEPbjQMTqddZ/
PCR is not a test for anything, one of the 2 creators of it even said that in a video I saw. It should never be used as a test, he said, because it gives false positives. It is to obtain more info on DNA strands but it isn't a test. Antibody tests don't look for viruses, you are correct - because those tests look for antibodies to the virus - and if present, they tell you that the person has had that particular virus. This means you can use antibody tests to see if transmission of that virus has occurred. I'm married to a virologist of many decades who has worked with all these things, including PCR process.
The inventor of the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, died in August 2019. He had also slammed Fauci in the past.
Was Mullis murdered?
That PCR test with the high testing thresholds was what fueled the plandemic.
I"ve wondered the same thing, he died about 6 months before covid came out and hated Fauci, also told ALOT of truth that deep state doesn't want us to know. He was an amazing scientist. Agreed about your last sentence, too! You've really been paying attention and have done your research, kudos to you!
I have too much time on my hands...but it saved me from taking the covid death shots.
..and now you're giving back by spreading TRUTH. Thank you!
Waiting for the drone strike on my house from DoD in 3, 2, 1.
Yes and no. There is no such thing as "antibodies of a virus". "Antibodies from the vaccine has no coorelate to protection" - FDA
I got this info from my husband, a virologist/immunologist of about 50 yrs experience. He says "viruses produce antibodies". You are quoting FDA - who are notorious for lying to the public. My husband has been watching them for decades. In this case it has no idea what they're talking about. Antibodies produced by a vaccine protect you from the virus - if this doesn't happen it either wasn't a vax or or it wasn't an effective vax. In this case, the vax didn't protect anyone from covid - so maybe FDA is inadvertently stating the truth? I don't know what they are talking about but in any vaccine made correctly it protects a person from the virus where antibodies came from. So yes, there most certainly is such a thing as "antibodies from a virus".
Ok. Then tell me what antibodies you get from nano-organic mercury, nano aluminum, mRNA that has the same structure as snake venom, mRNA from a Moth, Luciferase, firefly DNA. and... (SNIP) Covid vaccines contain NIH: Sodium Chloride drive autoimmune disease. NIH: Tromethamine, a Melamine, and Azatrine drive sterilization. Toxic SM-102 ethanol w/ Chloroform. Polyethlene Glycol (PEG) causing anaphylaxis, a potentially life-threatening reaction that can cause rashes, a plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and a fast heartbeat. Novavax Animal mRNA. Animal Venom, Viper Venom. Mercury & Aluminum. Organic Mercury in the form of Thiormersal like preservatives is in all injectibles. EPA: Mercury can cause brain and nervous system damage with in-utero exposure, and can cause kidney problems in both adults and children. NIH: Aluminum is the most neuro-toxic metal on Earth. And, as they claim there are 1.67 Million "virus's", which Antibodies do those produce?
Let me phrase it a different way: If a vax was done right and is truly a vax, your body will produce antibodies when the vax is introduced into your body. That's why people get an antibodies test - because if you have had the disease, your body will produce antibodies to that disease. A vaccine IF DONE RIGHT will do the same thing as if you've had the disease, meaning it will stimulate production of antibodies. That is why some people have gotten an antibodies test - to see if they have had covid or been exposed. If you have antibodies against a disease, your body has created some immunity against that disease, whether it's from your own body creating it or from a vaccine.
Um huh! Alex Jones said that "real vaccine's" are 99.9% effective for at least a decade!! Does that include the polio vaccine, where the Wikipedia sources admit that there is 400% more vaccine induced polio than what they call natural polio? Which was in fact, DDT poisoning. And, effective at what? All injectables have nano organic mercury in them! See the Wikipedia on preservatives in injectables. What does he mean by "effective"? Brain Damage?? https://www.bitchute.com/video/6qXdTECgTWbj/
Justin, there is a small problem with your new infographic: Abaluck (2022) did not conclude "no statistical difference". In fact, in the final publication the authors claim a statistically significant (just barely!) effect of 9.5% reduction in symptomatic seropositivity. You or I might read the study, and the Jefferson et al. criticisms, and decide: "no statistical difference, really". But that is NOT what the authors said, so you should not report it that way.
Scientific studies were done in the 1920's after the Spanish Flu Pandemic and the conclusion then were masks didn't work. 100 years later the pseudo-scientists like Fauci ignored that evidence, (but not at first), and claimed they worked. That was our first clue he was crooked.
What was poured over the study? Pancake syrup? Honestly. The phrase should be "pored over the study". It's hard to concentrate on the very good message when running across a major error in the first sentence.
Covid was a bioweapon.
The covid death shots are bioweapons.