The “placebo” was just another vaccine. When “testing” vaccines they just compare them to either an older version of the same vaccine or some other vaccine. Everyone needs to read “Turtles All the Way Down” vaccine science and myths. It’s eye opening. Data is manipulated all the time to make vaccines appear safer and more effective. We’ve been lied to for a very long time!
I have a fleeting recollection that the mRNA jabs were tested against saline for placebo. With other vaccines you are quite right in saying that they have been tested against other harmful products that will have hidden a lot of side effect signals. That is except for one very early vaccine that is no longer in use that did have a saline placebo and was then also used as the control for future vaccines.
I strongly believe that with adequately powered new studies (even RCT against saline placebo) we would struggle to find meaningful benefits in mortality figures. Vitamin-D3 will probably outperform almost all of the vaccines.
I have told people for a long time that this was all a study (and a bit of population control cough cough) and that the vax was not approved except for EUA. I hope more people wake up and see the truth.
Indeed. More damning evidence: "we show that Pfizer’s analyses deviate from the trial’s protocol in at least two important respects: (a) the timing of the data cutoff date for the interim analysis does not follow the timing defined in the protocol, and (b) the inclusion criteria for participants in the safety analysis are arbitrary. These are severe breaches of the standard drug approval process, as they allow for an artificial inflation of efficacy assessments whilst hiding potential safety signals.
It was on the basis of these already unfavourable, and possibly biased results that the FDA granted Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine an EUA. This provided Pfizer with an excuse to effectively terminate the double-blinded and controlled period of the vaccine’s phase III clinical trial. This in turn guaranteed that no long-term safety and efficacy follow-up, which adhered to acceptable standards for drug approval procedures, would ever be conducted." https://www.pandata.org/covid-19-vaccine-trial-review/
Not knowing anything about scientific "testing" for meds myself...
I question: Are the people(subjects) who got kicked out of the "testing" after the first dose because side effects also "unblinded". I recall hearing an account of an American woman who was a covid19 "vaxx" voluntary test subject. Her husband was tearfully telling the story. She was in her early 30s, a mother of two, and a scientist herself "and so proud to contribute to this great moment in science". She had a terrible reaction after the first jab. Not sure if it was pfizer or moderna. Either way, they dropped her as a subject because the test was for the "full course of vaxxine". In other words, they wanted to record only people who took two jabs (and maybe a booster, can't remember). Anyway, since her reaction - which was debilitating - made her unable to take the second jab results were dropped.
These companies are not to be trusted with their own studies.
I believe you are referring to a woman called Brianne. She is/was a pre-school teacher and her husband is a scientist. She was, indeed, kicked out of thenAstra Zeneca trial due to adverse reactions. Severe ones at that. Here is her interview with Del Bigtree if you are interested.
I did not watch the entire video you linked. She may be the very person. It has been, well, a full year now since I saw the video wherein the participant's husband told her story. I hope it is the same because I would hate to think that tragedy happened to two mothers. But I thought I recalled they were both scientists of a sort so I cannot confirm. Nor watch because her beautiful face looks so betrayed.
Honestly, so many videos, essays, opinions, facts and charts have been crammed into my small head space since the bullshit was let loose on kindman that I can know longer know where in my brain things are filed. I have never been a big consumer of media and was dragged kicking and screaming into this digital era. It's all - all of it - too much for my contemplative brain.
My pleasure and you summed up my situation, too. I was more of a Netflix rom-com person b4 c19 invaded our collective psyche. We’ve been forced to consume videos and articles on such a massive scale that it almost hurts the ol’ brain and forced me to buy reading glasses! Courage, mon amie!
The “placebo” was just another vaccine. When “testing” vaccines they just compare them to either an older version of the same vaccine or some other vaccine. Everyone needs to read “Turtles All the Way Down” vaccine science and myths. It’s eye opening. Data is manipulated all the time to make vaccines appear safer and more effective. We’ve been lied to for a very long time!
I have a fleeting recollection that the mRNA jabs were tested against saline for placebo. With other vaccines you are quite right in saying that they have been tested against other harmful products that will have hidden a lot of side effect signals. That is except for one very early vaccine that is no longer in use that did have a saline placebo and was then also used as the control for future vaccines.
I strongly believe that with adequately powered new studies (even RCT against saline placebo) we would struggle to find meaningful benefits in mortality figures. Vitamin-D3 will probably outperform almost all of the vaccines.
I have told people for a long time that this was all a study (and a bit of population control cough cough) and that the vax was not approved except for EUA. I hope more people wake up and see the truth.
#DiedSuddenly
Indeed. More damning evidence: "we show that Pfizer’s analyses deviate from the trial’s protocol in at least two important respects: (a) the timing of the data cutoff date for the interim analysis does not follow the timing defined in the protocol, and (b) the inclusion criteria for participants in the safety analysis are arbitrary. These are severe breaches of the standard drug approval process, as they allow for an artificial inflation of efficacy assessments whilst hiding potential safety signals.
It was on the basis of these already unfavourable, and possibly biased results that the FDA granted Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine an EUA. This provided Pfizer with an excuse to effectively terminate the double-blinded and controlled period of the vaccine’s phase III clinical trial. This in turn guaranteed that no long-term safety and efficacy follow-up, which adhered to acceptable standards for drug approval procedures, would ever be conducted." https://www.pandata.org/covid-19-vaccine-trial-review/
Not knowing anything about scientific "testing" for meds myself...
I question: Are the people(subjects) who got kicked out of the "testing" after the first dose because side effects also "unblinded". I recall hearing an account of an American woman who was a covid19 "vaxx" voluntary test subject. Her husband was tearfully telling the story. She was in her early 30s, a mother of two, and a scientist herself "and so proud to contribute to this great moment in science". She had a terrible reaction after the first jab. Not sure if it was pfizer or moderna. Either way, they dropped her as a subject because the test was for the "full course of vaxxine". In other words, they wanted to record only people who took two jabs (and maybe a booster, can't remember). Anyway, since her reaction - which was debilitating - made her unable to take the second jab results were dropped.
These companies are not to be trusted with their own studies.
I believe you are referring to a woman called Brianne. She is/was a pre-school teacher and her husband is a scientist. She was, indeed, kicked out of thenAstra Zeneca trial due to adverse reactions. Severe ones at that. Here is her interview with Del Bigtree if you are interested.
https://thehighwire.com/videos/vaccine-trial-participant-speaks-out/
I did not watch the entire video you linked. She may be the very person. It has been, well, a full year now since I saw the video wherein the participant's husband told her story. I hope it is the same because I would hate to think that tragedy happened to two mothers. But I thought I recalled they were both scientists of a sort so I cannot confirm. Nor watch because her beautiful face looks so betrayed.
Honestly, so many videos, essays, opinions, facts and charts have been crammed into my small head space since the bullshit was let loose on kindman that I can know longer know where in my brain things are filed. I have never been a big consumer of media and was dragged kicking and screaming into this digital era. It's all - all of it - too much for my contemplative brain.
Thank you for backing up my memory.
My pleasure and you summed up my situation, too. I was more of a Netflix rom-com person b4 c19 invaded our collective psyche. We’ve been forced to consume videos and articles on such a massive scale that it almost hurts the ol’ brain and forced me to buy reading glasses! Courage, mon amie!
It’s just a gift that keeps on giving