The “placebo” was just another vaccine. When “testing” vaccines they just compare them to either an older version of the same vaccine or some other vaccine. Everyone needs to read “Turtles All the Way Down” vaccine science and myths. It’s eye opening. Data is manipulated all the time to make vaccines appear safer and more effective. We’ve been lied to for a very long time!
I have told people for a long time that this was all a study (and a bit of population control cough cough) and that the vax was not approved except for EUA. I hope more people wake up and see the truth.
Indeed. More damning evidence: "we show that Pfizer’s analyses deviate from the trial’s protocol in at least two important respects: (a) the timing of the data cutoff date for the interim analysis does not follow the timing defined in the protocol, and (b) the inclusion criteria for participants in the safety analysis are arbitrary. These are severe breaches of the standard drug approval process, as they allow for an artificial inflation of efficacy assessments whilst hiding potential safety signals.
It was on the basis of these already unfavourable, and possibly biased results that the FDA granted Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine an EUA. This provided Pfizer with an excuse to effectively terminate the double-blinded and controlled period of the vaccine’s phase III clinical trial. This in turn guaranteed that no long-term safety and efficacy follow-up, which adhered to acceptable standards for drug approval procedures, would ever be conducted." https://www.pandata.org/covid-19-vaccine-trial-review/
Not knowing anything about scientific "testing" for meds myself...
I question: Are the people(subjects) who got kicked out of the "testing" after the first dose because side effects also "unblinded". I recall hearing an account of an American woman who was a covid19 "vaxx" voluntary test subject. Her husband was tearfully telling the story. She was in her early 30s, a mother of two, and a scientist herself "and so proud to contribute to this great moment in science". She had a terrible reaction after the first jab. Not sure if it was pfizer or moderna. Either way, they dropped her as a subject because the test was for the "full course of vaxxine". In other words, they wanted to record only people who took two jabs (and maybe a booster, can't remember). Anyway, since her reaction - which was debilitating - made her unable to take the second jab results were dropped.
These companies are not to be trusted with their own studies.
The “placebo” was just another vaccine. When “testing” vaccines they just compare them to either an older version of the same vaccine or some other vaccine. Everyone needs to read “Turtles All the Way Down” vaccine science and myths. It’s eye opening. Data is manipulated all the time to make vaccines appear safer and more effective. We’ve been lied to for a very long time!
I have told people for a long time that this was all a study (and a bit of population control cough cough) and that the vax was not approved except for EUA. I hope more people wake up and see the truth.
#DiedSuddenly
Indeed. More damning evidence: "we show that Pfizer’s analyses deviate from the trial’s protocol in at least two important respects: (a) the timing of the data cutoff date for the interim analysis does not follow the timing defined in the protocol, and (b) the inclusion criteria for participants in the safety analysis are arbitrary. These are severe breaches of the standard drug approval process, as they allow for an artificial inflation of efficacy assessments whilst hiding potential safety signals.
It was on the basis of these already unfavourable, and possibly biased results that the FDA granted Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine an EUA. This provided Pfizer with an excuse to effectively terminate the double-blinded and controlled period of the vaccine’s phase III clinical trial. This in turn guaranteed that no long-term safety and efficacy follow-up, which adhered to acceptable standards for drug approval procedures, would ever be conducted." https://www.pandata.org/covid-19-vaccine-trial-review/
Not knowing anything about scientific "testing" for meds myself...
I question: Are the people(subjects) who got kicked out of the "testing" after the first dose because side effects also "unblinded". I recall hearing an account of an American woman who was a covid19 "vaxx" voluntary test subject. Her husband was tearfully telling the story. She was in her early 30s, a mother of two, and a scientist herself "and so proud to contribute to this great moment in science". She had a terrible reaction after the first jab. Not sure if it was pfizer or moderna. Either way, they dropped her as a subject because the test was for the "full course of vaxxine". In other words, they wanted to record only people who took two jabs (and maybe a booster, can't remember). Anyway, since her reaction - which was debilitating - made her unable to take the second jab results were dropped.
These companies are not to be trusted with their own studies.
It’s just a gift that keeps on giving