Am not a statistician, so this Telegram post does not mean much to me. I think it's saying that the confounding affects are positively impacting vaccine effectiveness, but am not sure. (Have also posted this to Matthew Crawford's substack).
This is from Peter Dobromylskyj's latest Hyperlipid blog post.
"Controversial addendum: This link is to a less-than-preprint conversational musing piece from someone who has access to NHS data of a detail beyond anyone's wildest dreams in Twitterland, hence it's on Telegraph. So some serious caveats have to be applied but his conclusion is that the vaccines do absolutely nothing. At all. An interesting idea."
Am not a statistician, so this Telegram post does not mean much to me. I think it's saying that the confounding affects are positively impacting vaccine effectiveness, but am not sure. (Have also posted this to Matthew Crawford's substack).
This is from Peter Dobromylskyj's latest Hyperlipid blog post.
"Controversial addendum: This link is to a less-than-preprint conversational musing piece from someone who has access to NHS data of a detail beyond anyone's wildest dreams in Twitterland, hence it's on Telegraph. So some serious caveats have to be applied but his conclusion is that the vaccines do absolutely nothing. At all. An interesting idea."
From https://t.me/JohnDeesAlmanac/639
Thank you!!
Justin, are you green-yellow colorblind by any chance?