This article landed! I specifically appreciated how you addressed the issues of 'tested positive' with a test that has significant issues - to the manifestation of 'disease' presumed to be caused by the 'virus'. As you noted -- "This particular virus can cause a disease called COVID-19 (“Coronavirus Disease 2019”)" but yet the 'test' is what we measured and with that we conflated the significance of any 'public health' impact.

Expand full comment

"Deaths were counted with the widest-possible latitude ensuring a prominent psychological impact at every turn prompting policies mirroring population concerns."

Deaths were counted with the widest-possible latitude ensuring a prominent psychological impact at every turn prompting populations to align with mitigation efforts already planned by those in power.

There. Fixed it for you. It is a perfect example the Hegelian dialectic being used to implement change in a pre-determined direction.

Expand full comment

This is a literal case of the cure being worse than the disease.

Expand full comment

And…mail-in ballots.

Expand full comment

Completely agree that they’re playing God & just getting started....

Expand full comment

Great synopsis. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Great points, mostly on target.

I'd just say that there is no 'virus' to begin with.

That's the 'beauty' of this masterfully crafted PsyOp..


Expand full comment

You missed out the bit where a lab virus was released deliberately which they had tested to be extremely lethal, probably more than 5% death rate...... But once spread began in the wild it fizzled faster than the Titanic and seeing as the spooks were all in, balls to the wall on their fkg garbage vaccine passport narrative, which was already openly pressed right at the start long before there was even an understanding of the virus much less any vaxes available......

They just carried on bulls1hting to the max and try to push the agenda.

That is the only logical conclusion to draw at the end.

Obviously a lab virus and obviously wild spread is impossible to test and obviously the plastic made in China Fauci funded garbage fizzled out, because natural spread at lower concentrations to healthier people allowed immune system response to occur much more effectively than imagined in test subjects that snuffed it quickly.

This is too obvious.

You can either make fast spread or nasty lethal, nature doesn't allow both very well cos the time when someone is infectious also requires symptoms and if the virus is lethal the person is too sick too fast to spread anything.

HIV, Ebola, West Nile, Sars and Covid are all lab creations trying to install the vax pass paradigm. All failed.

There's plenty of evidence for this. They also tried several times to push vax passes with Swine Flu 1976 and 2009.

Expand full comment

Hmmm. Are you so sure about "yearly wave of respiratory viral pathogens" and "Wave after wave of virus variants"? Sure, that's what we've been taught, but those same people also taught "safe and effective."

Could the seasonal flu be a bodily detox triggered by the change in atmospheric conditions? If a virus is so contagious, why doesn't everyone get sick? Why have flu vaccines never actually worked? Why wasn't Rosenau able to infect anyone with the 1918 flu?

What's is the false positive rate on a PCR test (of anything) with a cycle threshold > 35? How did Drosten sequence this virus, without a sample? How do they actually genetically sequence all the variants of this "virus"? How did massive volumes of Covid-19 test kits get ordered in 2018 and 2019?

Why were the worldwide pandemic response measures 95% identical country to country? Would anyone anywhere have noticed any pandemic if the TV and social media were left off? Why were states, businesses, hospitals, nursing homes, doctors and media provided with huge sums of government (taxpayer) sponsored bribery as a reward for playing along with the narrative?

What's actually in the vials? Why are some injection batches much more deadly than others? Why hasn't mRNA ever before been a successful therapy on any animals or humans? Why do nano lipid hydrogel particles look like a "spike protein" under an electron microscope? Why have over 20 independent research groups found graphene and unusual, self-assembling particles in the vials?

What ACTUALLY happened? Worldwide fraud and intent to harm (both physically and psychologically), perpetuated within the hegelian dialctic as part of the plan for totalitarian world government targeted for 2030.

Expand full comment

Here's what I don't get. Why did so many believe the narrative and go along with it? I know so many just parroting the narrative, even to this day. I noticed what this was. Some of my friends and colleagues did. The readers here obviously did. How did more not see it?

Expand full comment

An excellent summary Mr. Hart. I would, myself, go so far as to say the climate change hoax was the beginning. Unfortunately, it didn't ramp up as quickly as they had hoped and people who go outside were beginning to question the narrative. Plan B - covid.

Expand full comment

Agree 100%. I've said all of these exact same things in my various writings over the past few years. I'll add that as a former US Army NBC Officer (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical), I am an expert on masks, filters, and biochemical agents. I knew from Day One that mask mandates would be a failure, primarily because the masks available to civilians would be completely ineffective, and secondarily because 99.99% of people lack the discipline to wear them and wear them properly. The only masks that could have been effective against a pathogen like CV-19 are military-grade gas masks, and there are not that many to go around. Even then, you can't wear them for extended periods, for multiple reasons. So why have mask mandates at all? Simple. 1) It was a big experiment to see how well the population could be manipulated and controlled; and 2) to show the population that the government "was doing something", and to give them "hope". Educated people knew better, but were routinely shouted down. This whole event is one reason why I continue to say that critical thinking skills in the US Schools are a disaster and need to be focused on and taught.

Expand full comment

Very good but he misses a couple of points. The shutdowns and social distancing is what actually created the "pandemic" It interfered with herd immunity allowing the virus to take hold and start mutating since it didn't burn out in one season like most do. The vaccine was designed to help the mutations along. It's knows science you don't vaccinate during a pandemic. He also misses the point that most of the covid cases in the beginning were actually flu cases. The PCR test couldn't differentiate as the CDC admitted and there is no way the flu dropped 95%. But this happens every year with the older population only the media isn't there to exaggerate and dramatize it.

Expand full comment


Both hoaxes:

1) the Covid-19 mortality hoax

2) the vaccines effectiveness hoaxe

...are proven by this original method:


...But even if someone 'gives a like' then soon continues to ignore it. No assistance from anybody from the U.S. has ever been given when writting it, only ignorance or insults from silly ones.

Expand full comment

With regard to the fraudulent, alleged SARS-Cov-2 "plandemic", the people who are primarily bringing the most important truths to light are those researches who have been comprehensively studying one or more of the following: coronaviruses and/or coronavirus research articles from very early on; all of the existing coronavirus research patent documents and coronavirus research funding grant applications and awards; all of the alleged Covid-19 injection product related contracts between various entities; all of the changes and additions to laws related to exemption from liability for debilitation and/or death caused by these injection products; and all of the laws related to the manufacture and/or use of biochemical weapons.

These people are, in part, Professor Francis Boyle, Dr. David E. Martin, Dr. Judy A. Mikovits, Karen Kingston, Katherine Watt, and Dr. Sasha Latypova.

With regard to mainly the alleged SARS-Cov-2 spike protein and the mRNA injection products, these people have shown that these products are:

1) man-made bioweapons funded mainly initially by Fauci's NIAID, with DARPA joining in the funding in 2005, when it recognized the bioweapon capabilities. Professor Boyle noted that in a peer reviewed 2015 Nature Medicine article, it can be seen that even the CCP has contributed to the funding.

2) the U.S. military, in cooperation with other countries, is apparently currently in full control of the research, production, and distribution. Pfizer and Moderna are paid billions of dollars for simply lending their corporate names to the products, while the U.S. military contracts with third-party manufacturers, some off-shore, to produce these bioweapon products.

A most important remaining issue is whether everyone involved in the development, production, and distribution of these bioweapons is exempt from liability. Apparently, the military, the manufacturers, and the government believe everyone has been made exempt from liability, via changes to U.S. laws and the appropriate wording of contracts. Karen Kingston and David Martin contend that, since these products are bioweapons, no one is exempt from liability.

This appears to be where we are at, waiting to see if some state AG has the guts to bring this to court.

I always recommend to people who aren't aware of the above to first watch the following 9:16 minute discussion between Canadian constitutional attorney Rocco Galati, Dr. David E. Martin, Dr. Judy A. Mikovits, and Attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Dr. David Martin tells us this is not a vaccine but rather a medical device.


The second video I recommend is "Plandemic Indoctornation" at freedomplatform.tv/movie

Expand full comment

If you read the independent, critical thinkers during this scam, you already knew all of this. It's wonderful to be vindicated.

Expand full comment