What % of patients are in the hospital from ailments related to Covid versus in the hospital and just happen to test positive with Covid. The debate is out in the open now.
in feb 2020 data from wuhan and lombard (italy) showed 99 - 98% covid death coincided with co-morbiidities.
has that observation been different in the usa? raw data from nyc in may 2020 showed around 93% co-morbidity with a large part of the sample no medical records or unk co-morbidity!
survival rate fro <74 in good health was 99.06 last i found.....
I have nearly completely written off my personal physician, as he refuses to consider any repurposed drugs as an early intervention treatment and is sticking to his guns on Remdesivir and the shots. I asked for recommendations on preventive, and it was only masks, distancing and the shots...no mention about exercise, fresh air, healthier diet or Vitamin D whatsoever.
The data manipulation and shenanigans that has been going on with regard to Covid is stunning. And a lot of the time, the information is right out there for anyone to see! It's like we're dealing with an alternate reality, where facts...publicized facts and data...are there to see but are being completely ignored in favor of the narrative.
Thanks for your diligence on this Justin. This so infuriating as we've known since early on that Covid deaths/hospitalizations were widely inflated due conflating "with" and "of". Why do so many seemingly smart people bot have a problem with the way deaths were categorized? Why would anyone think this is ok only purposely trying to deceive the public. Where do we go from here?
There's a certain amount of self-foot-shooting in all this, as ultimately the string pullers have brought matters to such a head that the only reliable stats are all-cause mortality. But looking at all-cause mortality in vax vs unvaxxed cohorts does not tell a tale that's very flattering for the string pullers.
Do we have *any* way to disentangle *from* and *with*? The 800K number in the US obviously includes both. What percentage is *from*. And among the *from* what were the mean, median, etc of the CT levels of the test?
I'm swagging at <200K deaths *from* Covid. Basic estimate is CT level of PCR test is allowed to go up to 10 orders of magnitude more sensitive than for other viruses in addition to the inclusion of *with*. And I think <200K is conservative.
in feb 2020 data from wuhan and lombard (italy) showed 99 - 98% covid death coincided with co-morbiidities.
has that observation been different in the usa? raw data from nyc in may 2020 showed around 93% co-morbidity with a large part of the sample no medical records or unk co-morbidity!
survival rate fro <74 in good health was 99.06 last i found.....
https://coronavirusbellcurve.com/
In Santa Clara county Covid death is reported if the deceased tested positive EVER. This is the report form for doctors https://publichealthproviders.sccgov.org/sites/g/files/exjcpb951/files/COVID-19-Death-Report-Form.pdf . If somebody got hit by a bus and had a positive test an year ago, this has to be reported as a Covid death!
I have nearly completely written off my personal physician, as he refuses to consider any repurposed drugs as an early intervention treatment and is sticking to his guns on Remdesivir and the shots. I asked for recommendations on preventive, and it was only masks, distancing and the shots...no mention about exercise, fresh air, healthier diet or Vitamin D whatsoever.
The data manipulation and shenanigans that has been going on with regard to Covid is stunning. And a lot of the time, the information is right out there for anyone to see! It's like we're dealing with an alternate reality, where facts...publicized facts and data...are there to see but are being completely ignored in favor of the narrative.
Thanks for your diligence on this Justin. This so infuriating as we've known since early on that Covid deaths/hospitalizations were widely inflated due conflating "with" and "of". Why do so many seemingly smart people bot have a problem with the way deaths were categorized? Why would anyone think this is ok only purposely trying to deceive the public. Where do we go from here?
Great post, thanks for all the links! 👍🏼
There's a certain amount of self-foot-shooting in all this, as ultimately the string pullers have brought matters to such a head that the only reliable stats are all-cause mortality. But looking at all-cause mortality in vax vs unvaxxed cohorts does not tell a tale that's very flattering for the string pullers.
Do we have *any* way to disentangle *from* and *with*? The 800K number in the US obviously includes both. What percentage is *from*. And among the *from* what were the mean, median, etc of the CT levels of the test?
I'm swagging at <200K deaths *from* Covid. Basic estimate is CT level of PCR test is allowed to go up to 10 orders of magnitude more sensitive than for other viruses in addition to the inclusion of *with*. And I think <200K is conservative.