8 Comments

EXCUSE ME!

I was assured by #thescience experts that Dolce-Gabbana designer scarves are effective against Covid viruses…

Expand full comment

Considering the 'pandemic' was created due to policies not a virus masks could never work to begin with unless the only goal was to create a perpetual sense of danger and with it fear and control?

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing

Expand full comment

Thanks for this Justin

Expand full comment

Most of medicine doesn't work.

Expand full comment

Surely, the mask fiasco pales into insignificance when compared to other consequential atrocities we've revealed since Covid man-modified for release upon the public to justify a 'DEADLY cure'.

The 'cure' does not work, but kills and maims! If vax recipients survive the jab, they will immediately become more susceptible to many more serious illnesses. Vax recipients will, in time, learn that these depopulating injections open the door wide to many shocking illnesses and ailments like heart issues, blood clots, and even other unrelated illnesses like Turbo-Cancers and Alzheimer's. The best any recipient of the 'cure' can expect is a shortened Life Expectancy!

So, Big Pharma cheated the introduction of dangerous, ineffective injections through a fictitious EUA process. Then mysterious unexpected 'BOOSTERS' suddenly appeared. (In my opinion, without any formal, legal safety authentication = No additional cheated EUA.) "The public won't ask questions - they're too dumb to notice what we just did"!

Then we learned the 'new covid "VACCINES" were not really 'Vaccines', but unproven mRNA injected technology that has proven a total medical disaster, causing millions of hidden Injuries and DEATHS as a direct consequence of this unproven, uncontrollable and unpredictable technology. Now, the FDA are sneaking another modification into all previously safe and effective vaccines. It's SA-mRNA, which means 'Self-Assembling' mRNA, which once injected, becomes a permanent dangerous Gene Editing component. Apparently, the 'SA' mRNA version removes the necessity of having to keep 'BOOSTING' shit into the human body! (My uneducated description, which won't be far off reality.)

And, you can be assured these poisons will come with NO LIABILITY for the super-wealthy manufacturers. Millions will die by injected crap but nobody seems to have the slightest interest.

The FDA have just authorised insane, intrusive, dangerous experiments which can be done to poor and insecure children. This disgusting 'lab rat' scheme can proceed without the parents or guardians knowledge. The only criteria these kids must meet is they must be receiving some sort of 'Welfare' - Even if it's ONLY being entitled to Free School Meals! Providing guinea pig 'PREY' to Big Pharma!

What has the world become when these ludicrous murderous tactics can be dome with total government approval! Our Governments have become Accessories to Mass-Murder!

Unjabbed Mick (UK) Ready to assist in the revolution to regain our FREEDOMS!

Expand full comment

As an early adopter of the position, "masks are stupid as hell" I welcome your analysis. (Love the infographic.) At the same time, early in the Great Covid Dumpster Fire it seemed to me that our position on masks was too weak to counter the use of Pascal's Wager to justify masking. In other words, nothing we shared can counter the position, "might help, won't hurt" and therefore masking can always be tried. I wonder if a better position might be, "not only do masks not help, but they could also harm." The data I have seen from history, maybe Swine Flu, seems to indicate that secondary infections driven by mask use can be almost as dangerous as primary infection by whatever virus masks do not protect from. Have you seen any data supporting this point of view?

Expand full comment

I got into a very long argument with someone who claimed that the authors of the Cochrane report said their report was BS. But what they were really saying was that the quality of the data showing masks work was BS. I think they actually thought the Cochrane Report was just "one study," when it is a aggregated review. Then they proceeded to share with me studies that the Cochrane had reviewed and found wanting.

But its not just in the data, it's in reality. Most of us know people who have never gotten Covid who don't wear a mask,as well as people who "tested positive" who mask quite a lot. So its obvious there is an independent factor here.

Thank you, and Ian Miller, and Cabrera for all that you guys do for the cause. Covid is all a Jenga Tower of lies.

Expand full comment

“The Cochrane Review poured over 78 mask studies”

What was it they poured over them? Sounds like maybe cold water? I assume they did this while poring over them.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/pore-over-vs-pour-over-poor-usage-difference

Expand full comment