12 Comments

EXCUSE ME!

I was assured by #thescience experts that Dolce-Gabbana designer scarves are effective against Covid viruses…

Expand full comment

Surely, the mask fiasco pales into insignificance when compared to other consequential atrocities we've revealed since Covid man-modified for release upon the public to justify a 'DEADLY cure'.

The 'cure' does not work, but kills and maims! If vax recipients survive the jab, they will immediately become more susceptible to many more serious illnesses. Vax recipients will, in time, learn that these depopulating injections open the door wide to many shocking illnesses and ailments like heart issues, blood clots, and even other unrelated illnesses like Turbo-Cancers and Alzheimer's. The best any recipient of the 'cure' can expect is a shortened Life Expectancy!

So, Big Pharma cheated the introduction of dangerous, ineffective injections through a fictitious EUA process. Then mysterious unexpected 'BOOSTERS' suddenly appeared. (In my opinion, without any formal, legal safety authentication = No additional cheated EUA.) "The public won't ask questions - they're too dumb to notice what we just did"!

Then we learned the 'new covid "VACCINES" were not really 'Vaccines', but unproven mRNA injected technology that has proven a total medical disaster, causing millions of hidden Injuries and DEATHS as a direct consequence of this unproven, uncontrollable and unpredictable technology. Now, the FDA are sneaking another modification into all previously safe and effective vaccines. It's SA-mRNA, which means 'Self-Assembling' mRNA, which once injected, becomes a permanent dangerous Gene Editing component. Apparently, the 'SA' mRNA version removes the necessity of having to keep 'BOOSTING' shit into the human body! (My uneducated description, which won't be far off reality.)

And, you can be assured these poisons will come with NO LIABILITY for the super-wealthy manufacturers. Millions will die by injected crap but nobody seems to have the slightest interest.

The FDA have just authorised insane, intrusive, dangerous experiments which can be done to poor and insecure children. This disgusting 'lab rat' scheme can proceed without the parents or guardians knowledge. The only criteria these kids must meet is they must be receiving some sort of 'Welfare' - Even if it's ONLY being entitled to Free School Meals! Providing guinea pig 'PREY' to Big Pharma!

What has the world become when these ludicrous murderous tactics can be dome with total government approval! Our Governments have become Accessories to Mass-Murder!

Unjabbed Mick (UK) Ready to assist in the revolution to regain our FREEDOMS!

Expand full comment

No. Masks were among the worst, possibly the worst. Masks have zero benefit against viruses, none. However, they have long been known to have perverse effects, meaning making it more likely to suffer a respiratory infection if misuses or over used. We can never know, however the following has been reported early in the panic. Healthy people wear a mask all day, every day. Instead of disposing on it each time they touch, or every 4 hours if they can go that long without touching it, as mask hygiene requires, will eventually suffer respiratory problems, possible infection. They go to the hospital and are fraudulently give the PCR technique, not a test, that indicates at best, exposure to part of the virus. This false positive along with their respiratory symptoms gets them labeled as a “covid case” and they are treated for it. Meanwhile, the cause of their respiratory distress may be bacterial or even fungal, but they are not treated for these as they have been misdiagnosed as having covid, which is caused by a virus. Not being treated for what they actually have, they succumb but are miscounted as a covid death which is then used to scare more people to wear a mask and the cycle repeated over and over.

Now that a great portion of humanity has worn masks daily for years, for the first time ever, plastic fibers are found in the lung tissue of vast numbers of people. Where did that come from? Well, the masks certainly didn’t keep it out of the lungs, did it? So at a minimum, if masks cannot keep plastic fibers out, how can they keep viruses out? Or, masks are the source of both the bacterial, fungal and even possibly viral infection of the wearer and for the fibers now in their lungs.

Masking was the source of many misdiagnoses that lead to death that ramped up fear and are the cause for the problems caused by the fibers now in most of humanities lungs.

Masking all the time is BAD. VERY VERY BAD.

Expand full comment

As an early adopter of the position, "masks are stupid as hell" I welcome your analysis. (Love the infographic.) At the same time, early in the Great Covid Dumpster Fire it seemed to me that our position on masks was too weak to counter the use of Pascal's Wager to justify masking. In other words, nothing we shared can counter the position, "might help, won't hurt" and therefore masking can always be tried. I wonder if a better position might be, "not only do masks not help, but they could also harm." The data I have seen from history, maybe Swine Flu, seems to indicate that secondary infections driven by mask use can be almost as dangerous as primary infection by whatever virus masks do not protect from. Have you seen any data supporting this point of view?

Expand full comment

There have been laws and regulations for the use of respiratory protection going back to the Victorian age. To use a respirator for any commercial activity in the US, Canada and elsewhere, certification in their use is required. They are not benign. N95 are respirators. Any hospital that required these to be used while not ensuring their employees were certified broke the law. Masks are not respirators and are not covered by such stringent regulations, however, when getting certified in respirators, I learned the limitations and health risks of masks. They are not benign and this has been known for over 100 years.

I have given this argument countless trimesters these past 4 + years. No matter. Mad maskers are mad. They do not care. They cannot be reasoned with.

Expand full comment

I got into a very long argument with someone who claimed that the authors of the Cochrane report said their report was BS. But what they were really saying was that the quality of the data showing masks work was BS. I think they actually thought the Cochrane Report was just "one study," when it is a aggregated review. Then they proceeded to share with me studies that the Cochrane had reviewed and found wanting.

But its not just in the data, it's in reality. Most of us know people who have never gotten Covid who don't wear a mask,as well as people who "tested positive" who mask quite a lot. So its obvious there is an independent factor here.

Thank you, and Ian Miller, and Cabrera for all that you guys do for the cause. Covid is all a Jenga Tower of lies.

Expand full comment

Any data that purports to show masks work should be received the same as any that claims that screen doors work on submarines.

Expand full comment

Considering the 'pandemic' was created due to policies not a virus masks could never work to begin with unless the only goal was to create a perpetual sense of danger and with it fear and control?

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing

Expand full comment

Thanks for this Justin

Expand full comment

Most of medicine doesn't work.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this, especially the interview with the author, I believe lead author, of the Cochran study. I had this but lost it before I saved it.

For those who still believe in masks, just ask them why haven’t they stopped covid in Japan where we had a reported 99% but observed my myself statistically 100% mask compliance yet had 8 successively larger waves during the mad masking time.

Expand full comment

“The Cochrane Review poured over 78 mask studies”

What was it they poured over them? Sounds like maybe cold water? I assume they did this while poring over them.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/pore-over-vs-pour-over-poor-usage-difference

Expand full comment