Harvard Research Confirms What We've Been Saying for Months
Harvard Research Confirms What We've Been Saying for Months
There is not evidentiary correlation between cases and vaccination rates
I have no idea how this paper made it past the censors but there it is! This was published a month ago but didn’t receive much fanfare and now we know why—it confirms what we’ve been saying for months now: the vaccines have not stopped and likely will not stop the pandemic.
Back in July we tweeted that the CDC data mapping vax rates to COVID-19 case rates shows ZERO impact of the former on the latter:
We’ve written in these pages multiple times about the same phenomenon. Yesterday, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford tweeted:
“There is a lot to learn from this graph, but most obviously, the COVID vax does not stop infection. The vax provides a private benefit (protection vs. severe disease), but limited public benefit (protection vs. disease spread). So what is the argument for mandates?”
Now this Harvard research notes:
At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days (Fig. 1). In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.
When they got down to the U.S. county level the relation was even less discernible:
They conclude:
The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined, especially considering the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the likelihood of future variants
Feel some vindication folks. We were right.
We might be defining "cases" incorrectly. The lion's share of "cases" are being "diagnosed" strictly through the PCR test which can and does detect as little as three different FRAGMENTS of ONE RNA STRAND - and THEN this is called a "case," which is being treated, regardless of viral load, as a contagious infection. We all carry a wide variety of viruses in our noses and mucous membranes virtually EVERY DAY of our lives, but that does NOT mean we are infected or contagious. The PCR test is creating many, many fallicies and is being used to set public policy. The inventor of the PCR test has been quoted as saying that this test was NEVER developed to be a diagnostic one-stop test. Rather it is designed to detect genetic material of viruses. THIS TEST IS BEING GROSSLY MISUSED BY MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS ALL OVER THE WORLD.
How anyone believes anything these people say astounds me. What is with that? It’s like people who cheer and defend their favorite sports team (former sports fanatic myself) until I came to the realization that it doesn’t matter. Why let a game that I’m not playing make me either happy or angry? So stupid. These people have lied and lied, continued to move the goalposts again and again, yet still the defenders will tie themselves into pretzels defending them. I get it a little bit if they are paid shills... but the everyday rubes? Just shows how easily manipulated people can be... like some form of Stockholm Syndrome (spelling?). Just like trying to defend Biden; you have to be borderline brain dead to support or defend this clown’s administration. With that... Let’s Go Brandon!